chelsea

About Chelsea Tran

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Chelsea Tran has created 56 blog entries.

How far will Sydney and Melbourne house prices fall in 2025?

Sydney and Melbourne housing prices could fall by 5 per cent in 2025, driven lower by a glut of listings, unaffordable prices and high interest rates, the latest Housing Boom and Bust report by SQM Research predicts.

Property prices in Canberra and Hobart are also predicted to drop by up to 6 per cent and 3 per cent respectively.

Report author and SQM Research managing director Louis Christopher said the bulk of the forecast price falls would occur in the first half of next year before interest rate cuts, which are expected by the June quarter.

“Current interest rate settings are biting the community more in these cities which, on our measurements, are in overvalued territory and/or are experiencing slower economic growth compared to the cities and states that have enjoyed good economic growth,” he said.

“However, once interest rate cuts do occur, we are expecting a speedy bounce in demand for Sydney and Melbourne in particular, which both are still experiencing underlying housing shortage relative to the strong population growth rates.

“This may well mean there is a good window for buyers at this time for our two largest capital cities.”

Sydney home values started to weaken last month, albeit marginally, falling by 0.1 per cent, while Melbourne slipped by 0.2 per cent, separate CoreLogic data shows.

However, the pace of decline has increased over the four weeks that ended on November 24, with CoreLogic’s daily index showing prices falling by 0.2 per cent and 0.3 per cent in the markets respectively.

The two leading indicators for housing prices – auction clearance rates and the amount of stock on market – suggested price drops in those cities would persist, Mr Christopher said.

Clearance rates have slumped to the low 40 per cent range across Sydney, which historically has indicated housing price falls of a moderate to potentially heavy extent, according to SQM’s data. Melbourne’s clearance rates have fallen to around 45 per cent, signalling an ongoing downturn.

At the same time, stock on the market has piled up. Stock levels are running higher than the start of the downturn of 2018 to 2019 – a period where Sydney housing prices fell by about 12 per cent from peak to trough.

‘Ripe for a correction’

Similarly, in Melbourne, total listings have blown out to about 42,000 dwellings – 5000 above the long-term average, and a level that has created housing price falls in the past, SQM’s analysis shows.

“The Sydney housing market is ripe for a correction. Our leading indicators tell us it’s happening, and our fair valuation models tell us it should be happening,” Mr Christopher said.

“Melbourne currently has a surplus of properties and the situation has deteriorated over the course of 2024, indicating an ongoing weakness in the market.

“But we’re not expecting a house price crash because there’s still a considerable shortage of homes in those cities compared to underlying demand for accommodation.”

By contrast, house prices in Perth, Brisbane, Adelaide and Darwin are expected to pick up steam.

Perth prices are forecast to rise by up to 19 per cent, the sharpest increase of all capital cities, followed by Brisbane with 14 per cent growth, Adelaide with 13 per cent rise and Darwin with 8 per cent gain.

While still the largest gains in the country, they are slower than the increases notched up so far this year. As at the end of October, Perth dwelling values had increased by 24 per cent, Brisbane was up by 14.5 per cent and Adelaide by 14.8 per cent according to CoreLogic.

“We’re seeing nothing in those markets that suggests an imminent price decline,” Mr Christopher said.

“Stock levels are extremely tight, demand is very strong due to ongoing population growth and their economies are doing well.”

Interest rate factors

Mr Christopher’s base case prediction – one of the four potential scenarios – assumes interest rates fall by 0.5 per cent by mid-next year.

The forecast is also based on the assumptions that population growth is at least 500,000 over 2025, and that there are no new spikes in inflation that would trigger a rate rise or would prompt the RBA to hold off easing.

In a second scenario where there is no rate cut, but no surge in inflation, and with population still increasing by 500,000 or more, house prices in Sydney and Canberra would tumble by 8 per cent, Melbourne by 7 per cent, and Hobart by 5 per cent.

It will reduce Perth’s price gains to 11 per cent, Brisbane 9 per cent, Adelaide by 8 per cent and Darwin by 7 per cent.

Paul Bloxham, HSBC’s chief economist said the risk of the Reserve Bank not cutting interest rates has increased.

“On a core basis, the economy is still operating at, probably still a bit beyond its full capacity, and the very slow decline in inflation means the RBA really can’t consider cutting interest rates anytime soon,” he said.

“The job market is still at, or slightly beyond full employment and does not appear to be loosening further at this stage.

“If it turns out the job market is not loosening further, then rate cuts may not happen at all. At the moment, we think there is a 25 per cent chance that interest rates don’t get cut at all in 2025.”

Oxford Economics senior economist Maree Kilroy said while interest rate cuts could be delayed until June next year, they would be deeper than what the market was predicting.

“We’re expecting the RBA to slash the cash rate by a total of 1.25 percentage points to bring it back to neutral settings,” she said.

“This will improve mortgage affordability and help price growth in the following year.”

How far will Sydney and Melbourne house prices fall in 2025?2024-11-28T16:07:46+11:00

Warren Buffetts’ s 11 tips for investing and life

1. “If you’re smart, you don’t need a lot of money. And if you’re dumb, no amount of money is going to help you.”

If you’re smart you will understand the power of compounding interest. You will know the difference between a company that has a durable competitive advantage and one that doesn’t. And you will know how to value a company to determine if it is overpriced or underpriced. With that knowledge, you can take even a small sum of money and grow it exponentially to be worth millions of dollars. But if you’re dumb, even if you start with millions, eventually you are going to lose it all.

2. “The important thing is to know what you know and know what you don’t know.”

The secret behind Buffett’s incredible success is not an incredible intellect or being the all-knowing oracle of Omaha. In fact, it’s just the opposite. It’s actually about knowing what he doesn’t know. This stops Buffett from making investment decisions he isn’t qualified to make. An accountant would be inviting folly if he tried to play doctor.

Buffett feels the same way about investing. There are certain companies he has no idea how to value, and as a result he stays away from them. Then there are companies that he understands and feels very qualified to value – these are the ones that have made him super rich.

Buffett refers to this world of businesses that he understands well enough to value as his “circle of competence”– which means he is confident in his ability to value them. If he can confidently value companies, he can confidently tell if the sharemarket is undervaluing them or overvaluing them.

For Buffett, being able to spot when the market is undervaluing a company shows him where the big money is.

3. “Don’t save what is left after spending; spend what is left after saving.”

One gets rich by getting their money to work for them, but that won’t happen unless they first have money saved up to make that initial investment. For most people, the first money they have to invest comes from saving a percentage of what they earn from a job.

In Buffett’s teenage days, he was obsessed with saving money from the various little businesses he ran. And with his obsession for saving money came an aversion to spending it.

Buffett was so averse to spending money that he drove an old Volkswagen Beetle long after he had become a multimillionaire, and he still lives in the same house he paid $US31,500 for in 1957. In Buffett’s case, saving money was way more fun than spending money, unless, of course, he was buying stocks.

4. “My wealth has come from a combination of living in America, some lucky genes, and compound interest.”

Albert Einstein once said, “Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it earns it … He who doesn’t, pays it.”

Buffett took this to heart early in his life and it truly has been the gift that kept on giving.

Here is how compounding interest works: $50,000 compounding at 10 per cent a year will be worth $55,000 after one year, $60,500 after two years, $66,550 after three years. After 10 years it will be worth $129,687. After 20 years it will be worth $336,375. After 30 years, $872,470. After 40 years, $2,262,962. After 50 years, $5,869,542.

In the first 10 years, we made $79,687 in interest on our $50,000 investment. But between the years 10 and 20 we made $206,688 in interest. And between years 20 to 30 we made $536,095 in interest. Between the years 30 and 40 we made $1,390,492 in interest. Between the years 40 and 50 we made $3,606,580 in interest. As the pot gets bigger, we make more and more in interest, which grows the pot even larger.

When Buffett took over Berkshire Hathaway, he stopped the company from paying a dividend so all the earnings would build up in Berkshire. Using his investment prowess, Buffett got Berkshire’s shareholders’ equity to compound at the phenomenal rate of 18.55 per cent a year for 59 years, growing shareholder’s equity from $US24.5 million in 1965 to approximately $US561.2 billion in 2024, for a total gain of 2,290,512 per cent.

Responding to the increase in shareholder’s equity, the market price for Berkshire’s stock, from 1965 to 2024, grew from $US12.50 a Class A share to $US632,000 a Class A share, which equates to an annual compounding growth rate of approximately 20.15 per cent.

Note: Our $50,000 investment compounding at a rate of 20.15 per cent a year, for 59 years, would be worth $2.52 billion in year 59, which is exactly how several of Buffett’s early investors ended up billionaires.

5. “From the standpoint of investments, you need two courses in a business school: one is how to value a business, and the other is how to think about sharemarket fluctuations.”

If Buffett was teaching a course in business school on how to value a business, he would teach students that there are basically two kinds of businesses.

(1) Businesses that sell commodity-type products, which have lots of price competition, low profit margins, low returns on equity, and volatile net earnings. These are the companies you don’t want to own.

(2) Exceptional businesses, which have some kind of durable competitive advantage, as evidenced by little price competition, high profit margins, high returns on equity, consistent earnings, and are buying back their shares. These are the right companies to own, and once identified, Buffett would explain to the students how to tell if they are selling at a price that makes business sense to buy them.

Buffett’s course on sharemarket fluctuations would provide a historical study of what market forces create buying opportunities. He would teach the students the history of events and forces that dramatically affect stock prices, what drives them from insane highs to depressing lows, and how these events can affect the share prices of companies with a durable competitive advantage and in the process create investment opportunities.

6. “You don’t want to be a no-emotion person in all of your life, but you definitely want to be a no-emotion person in making an investment or business decision.”

Buffett’s investment decisions – after weighing the economics of the business and the price he is paying – are based solely on whether or not he believes he is getting good value for his money. He’s very cold about it. In his early days, if he had a position that was making him money, even if he loved the company, if something better came along, he would sell it in a nanosecond and go with the new prospect.

He bought and sold his favourite Capital Cities Communications several times before he settled into a long-term position with it. This is the reason Buffett doesn’t react with fear in a stock market panic. His lack of emotion enables him to see long-term value and buy when everyone else is running for the fire escape. It’s also why he doesn’t get caught up in the euphoria of a bull market and end up paying insane prices for businesses.

7. “The most important item over time in valuation is obviously interest rates. If interest rates are destined to be at very low levels … it makes any stream of earnings from investments worth more money.”

Let’s say that Company A constantly produces earnings of $10 million a year. In a world of 10 per cent interest rates, we would have to invest $100 million in bonds that were paying 10 per cent to earn $10 million a year. Buffett would argue that Company A is worth $100 million relative to a 10 per cent interest rate. ($100 million × 10 per cent = $10 million.) Now, let’s say interest rates dropped to 2 per cent. We would have to invest $500 million in bonds paying 2 per cent to earn $10 million a year. ($500 million × 2 per cent = $10 million.) Buffett would argue that Company A’s earnings of $10 million a year are now worth $500 million relative to the 2 per cent interest rate.

The same inverse relationship also exists when discounting the future cash flows of a business to present value. The higher the discount rate, the lower the present value. The lower the discount rate, the higher the present value. So, a payment of $10 million a year for 10 years, discounted to present value, using a rate of 10 per cent, would have a present value of $61.3 million. But if we used a 2 per cent discount rate, a payment of $10 million a year for 10 years would have a present value of $89.4 million.

When interest rates drop, the relative value of what businesses earn goes up – and eventually, stock prices will follow upward as well. But when interest rates go up, the relative value of what businesses earn goes down – and stock prices will eventually go down as well.

8. “Obviously, profits are worth a whole lot more if the government bond yield is 1 per cent than they’re worth if the government bond yield is 5 per cent.”

For Buffett, all investment valuations are invariably linked to interest rates. If you owned a share of Apple stock and it earned $6.43 a share in 2023, you would need $128 invested in a 5 per cent government bond to yield you $6.43. But in a world of 1 per cent government bonds, you would need $643 invested in 1 per cent government bonds to yield $6.43. So as interest rates go down, stock prices “tend” to go up. And if interest rates go up, stock prices “tend” to go down.

Why government bonds? If they are United States Treasury bonds, they are thought of as being risk-free of default. In 2024, 10-year US Treasury bonds traded at 4.3 per cent, which gave Apple’s $6.43-a-share-earnings a relative value of $149 a share, against Apple shares reaching an all-time trading high in 2024 of $225 a share, which was 66 per cent above its relative value of $149 a share.

Buffett’s response to this overvaluation was to start selling his holdings in Apple. Even the best of companies can become overvalued – and when they do, Buffett will often cut his position.

9. “We do like having a lot of money to be able to operate very fast and very big. We know we won’t get those opportunities frequently … In the next 20 or 30 years there’ll be two or three times when it’ll be raining gold and all you have to do is go outside. But we don’t know when they will happen. And we have a lot of money to commit.”

Charlie Munger used to put it like this: “You have to be very patient. You have to wait until something comes along, which, at the price you’re paying, is easy. That’s contrary to human nature, just to sit there all day long doing nothing, waiting. It’s easy for us, we have a lot of other things to do. But for an ordinary person, can you imagine just sitting for five years doing nothing? You don’t feel active, you don’t feel useful, so you do something stupid.”

This is not the investment strategy of any fund manager in the world. Hold billions in cash and wait for the world to fall apart. But it is true – every 10 years or so, the financial world does fall apart and stock prices tank across the board. It happened in 2000 when the internet bubble burst, it happened in 2008 to 2009 when Wall Street imploded with the mortgage-backed bonds, it happened in 2020 with the COVID shutdown, and it will happen again and again.

And when it happens, stock prices will collapse, and the banks of the world will do what they always do, which is print tons of cash to pull us out of it, which will ultimately be bullish for stock prices. The hedge funds, mutual funds, and investment trusts of the world can’t play Buffett’s waiting game, they can’t sit on cash waiting for the mega opportunity. But Buffett can. And so can you!

10. “Opportunities come infrequently. When it rains gold, put out the bucket, not the thimble.”

Buffett often talks about temperament. He means having the patience to wait for the right opportunity. By his own admission, he has sometimes sat waiting patiently for several years for the right investment opportunity to show up. And when it finally shows up, he takes full advantage and buys big.

Back in the 1980s, Buffett spent $US1.3 billion on Coca-Cola stock – which, today in 2024, is worth approximately $US24.4 billion. In the 1990s, he spent $US1.4 billion on American Express shares, which are now worth approximately $US32.4 billion. In the 2000s he bought $US14 billion worth of Bank of America stock, which was worth approximately $US35.1 billion in 2024 when he started thinning his position. In the 2010s, he spent $US31 billion for his Apple shares – which in the beginning of 2024 were worth a whopping $US176.8 billion before he started selling his position.

Invest big and win big if you follow in Buffett’s footsteps and buy shares in a company with a durable competitive advantage, and you buy it at a price that makes sense from a business perspective.

11. “There are a lot of businesses I wouldn’t buy even if I thought the management was the most wonderful in the world because they are simply in the wrong business.”

This goes back to something Buffett said in the 1990s: “When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for poor fundamental economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact.”

Some businesses have inherent underlying economics that are so bad that even the best managers in the world can’t improve upon them. These are usually companies that sell a commodity-type product or service in which there is a lot of price competition, that historically sees a repetitive cycle of boom and bust. In the boom years demand outstrips supplies, creating huge profit margins, but in the bust years, low demand kills their profit margins, and their fixed costs end up killing them.

You can easily identify these businesses by an erratic earnings history – losses some years, very profitable in other years. They never buy back their shares, and usually carry a large amount of debt. All of which tells you it’s the wrong business to own – no matter what the selling price is.

The New Tao of Warren Buffet by Mary Buffett and David Clark, is published by Simon & Schuster.

Warren Buffetts’ s 11 tips for investing and life2024-11-25T17:12:28+11:00

House prices fall in 40pc of Sydney Suburbs

House prices are now falling across two out of every five Sydney suburbs, a five-fold increase from a year ago, and the highest level in 20 months, data from CoreLogic shows.

The share of Melbourne suburbs where house values dropped in the past three months also blew out to 76.3 per cent, six times higher than last year.

Tim Lawless, CoreLogic’s research director, said the downturn was becoming more widespread as stock levels rose, borrowing capacity shrank and affordability worsened.

“We’re now seeing a fairly broad-based, but so far, mild downturn,” he said. “Sydney is still in the early phase of the downswing, so we’ll probably see more suburbs where house prices drop in the coming months.”

Sydney home values fell by 0.1 per cent last month, the first monthly decline in almost two years, while Melbourne dipped by 0.2 per cent as the housing outlook dimmed.

The number of Sydney suburbs where house prices fell over the past three months to October jumped to 225, up from just 46 last year.

Similarly in Melbourne, values have dropped across 290 suburbs, a sharp rise from only 48 a year ago.

Louis Christopher, SQM Research managing director, said house prices in both cities were on track to fall further in the coming months.

“Auction clearance rates are now falling in Sydney, well beyond the seasonal weakness, and we’re seeing a marked increase in distressed selling across Melbourne,” he said.

“There are now 1117 total distressed listings in Melbourne as of November 6, which is the highest level since we started tracking in 2020.

“In the past year distressed selling surged by 28.4 per cent, which tells me there are more property owners that are struggling financially, as confirmed by the rising default rates,” Mr Christopher said.

Moody’s Ratings analysis showed mortgage delinquency rates increased across the country over the year to May. Melbourne emerged as the epicentre of arrears. The portion of mortgage defaults across the city increased by 0.73 of a percentage point to 2.54 per cent, just behind Hobart, which posted a 1.3 percentage point rise in arrears to 2.68 per cent.

Melbourne dominated the top 20 suburbs with the highest mortgage default rates. Fourteen suburbs posted delinquency rates as high as 5.37 per cent. By contrast, many suburbs with the lowest default rates were in Brisbane and Sydney.

However, there are signs that worsening affordability has started to weigh across Brisbane, as house prices dropped in 36 suburbs out of 326, an eightfold rise from just four suburbs last year.

House values lower

Nationally, house values for about one out of three suburbs have drifted lower, which is more than double from a year ago.

By contrast, the number of Adelaide suburbs where house values fell over the past three months shrank by about half, while prices in all Perth suburbs rose during the same period.

The surge in listings across the biggest capitals has significantly outpaced demand, which has weighed on prices.

Total listings climbed by 7.1 per cent across Sydney over the past four weeks to November 3 compared to a year ago and lifted by 4.2 per cent and 4.9 per cent in Melbourne and Brisbane, respectively.

Total listings are now 13.2 per cent above the previous five-year average in Sydney and 13 per cent higher in Melbourne.

“Values are still falling in Melbourne because of a big increase in listings by disgruntled investors selling up in Victoria,” said Scott Kuru, co-founder of property investment advisory Freedom Property Investors.

“Nevertheless, this is a great time to buy in Melbourne. Melbourne property is seriously undervalued at the moment, especially when you look at population inflows – from overseas and other states – to what’s arguably now Australia’s largest city.

“Buying conditions probably aren’t going to get much better in Melbourne, but if you see a great investment grade property in Brisbane or Sydney I wouldn’t hang around on the off chance prices might decline,” he said.

Sydney downturn ‘accelerating’

The upper end of the housing market posted the sharpest decline of up to $326,000 in just three months as demand wanes amid higher borrowing costs and property prices.

House prices in Rodd Point in Sydney’s inner west, along with Abbotsford and Balmain East slumped by at least 7 per cent or the equivalent declines of between $221,797 and $325,846 during the same period. Those suburbs have also dropped by 8.2 per cent, 7.6 per cent and 2.1 per cent in the past 12 months respectively.

“The downturn in the top 25 per cent of the housing market, particularly in Sydney is clearly gaining some momentum,” Mr Lawless said.

“House values in this segment had been falling since June last year and in the past two months alone, they declined by 1.1 per cent, which is nearly twice as fast compared to the previous two months.

“So, it doesn’t look like this trend is turning around. It seems like it’s actually accelerating,” he said.

Across Melbourne, house values in inner suburbs Albert Park, South Melbourne and Port Melbourne tumbled by 9 per cent, 8.6 per cent and 8 per cent respectively, equating to a loss of between $132,882 and $213,677 in the past three months.

In Brisbane, Teneriffe led the largest drops in house values, at 4.8 per cent or a decline of $100,571 in the median.

House prices in suburbs within Adelaide’s Central and Hills district also weakened, with Hazelwood Park, Rosslyn Park and Kensington Garden posting 3 per cent, 2.6 per cent and 1.8 per cent respectively.

House prices fall in 40pc of Sydney Suburbs2024-11-25T17:06:59+11:00

Why Melbourne’s housing market is primed to outperform all capitals

Melbourne’s housing market could outperform Sydney and other capital cities once it emerges from its current downturn, boosted by a marked improvement in affordability after years of weak growth, experts say.

Nicola Powell, Domain’s chief of research and economics, said house price declines in Melbourne could gather momentum over the near term as listings rise faster than demand.

“I think Melbourne still has its challenges with taxation, higher supply and weaker population dynamics, so the immediate outlook is still one of a struggle,” she said.

“But I believe that once we see rates falling and particularly if we see a handful in succession, that is likely to be a spark for pricing.

“So in the next cycle, we’re likely to see Melbourne overperform because it has underperformed significantly compared to other capital cities since March 2020,” Dr Powell said. “That’s exactly what we’ve seen in Perth when it underperformed during the 2010s and then prices exploded in the 2020s as it played catch up.”

Melbourne-based property investor Patrick Van is counting on that sharp upturn and plans to ramp up his portfolio.

He is in the process of settling his second investment property in the city, a two-bedroom, two-bathroom off-the-plan apartment in North Melbourne, and aims to buy another in the coming months.

“I think Melbourne offers excellent value for money compared to other cities, and the state government just slashed stamp duty for off-the-plan properties,” he said.

“Even with higher interest rates and property tax, and despite the prospect of weaker capital growth over the next few months, I believe Melbourne will take off once interest rates start dropping next year.

“So I’m happy to sacrifice the lack of growth over a short period of time for the potential of making a windfall over the medium to long term because property investing is a long-term strategy, not a get-rich-quick scheme.”

AMP capital’s Shane Oliver said Melbourne could lift between 7 per cent and 8 per cent in the next upswing, while Sydney was on track to gain about 5 per cent.

Melbourne’s been lagging for some time, but it has made the property market relatively cheap compared to Sydney and the other cities,” he said.

“Because of its relative underperformance, it could bounce back a little bit quicker and sharper. ”

Since the onset of the pandemic in March 2020, Melbourne’s home values have increased by just 10 per cent.

By contrast, Sydney climbed 29 per cent, Brisbane was up 67 per cent, Adelaide jumped 71 per cent and Perth surged by 76 per cent, according to CoreLogic.

“It doesn’t make sense for Melbourne to stay the cheapest among the top five capital cities, so it is bound to come back and outpace any other capital city in Australia,” said Scott Kuru, co-founder of Freedom Property Investors.

“This is likely to happen because of lower interest rates, more affordable housing and government support. So, it’s only a matter of time before Melbourne becomes the second most expensive Australian city to buy a house in again.”

However, Ray White chief economist Nerida Conisbee said Melbourne’s recovery could take longer than market expectations.

“I think the downturn will be prolonged, even with rate cuts,” she said.

“I think there are other bigger problems that will take longer to fix, such as the prohibitive tax system, poor confidence and weak economy.”

Why Melbourne’s housing market is primed to outperform all capitals2024-11-25T17:00:38+11:00

Are you really ready to retire?

People who have enjoyed highly rewarding and fulfilling careers often struggle with when to retire.

They might feel they have enough money but wonder whether they’ll be bored, unchallenged or irrelevant.

Thinking about when to leave, how important work is for you, what makes you happy and how you will spend your time are important considerations.

I’ve spent the past 17 years researching the psychology of retirement and here are nine things to ponder as you plan for the next stage.

1. Six buckets

My research team and I suggest thinking about retirement in six buckets: physical (anything that keeps you mobile); financial (keeping track of finances); social (spending time with people); emotional (keeping emotions in check and positive); cognitive (learning new things and keeping active) and motivational (looking to the future and setting goals).

2. Work hard on your health

When we consult the latest edition of the ABS Retirement Intentions survey (2022-23), about a third of people will retire because they can access their super or pensions.

Others may be forced out by ill-health (13 per cent) and another 5 per cent will be retrenched, dismissed or have no work available.

The lesson here? Keep yourself well so you can retire when you want, and anticipate change where you can so you have your ducks lined up in case things don’t go as well as you planned.

One way to avoid deciding about when to retire is to let your health make the decision for you.

Health is something that probably cannot wait. Many people tell me they plan to eat better, relax more and exercise in retirement.

Are there some lifestyle changes you can make now to maximise your choices later and avoid being one of the 13 per cent leaving due to ill-health?

3. Aim to leave on your own terms

Two studies I’ve conducted with different samples over the past 17 years point to the fact that being forced out of work unexpectedly from ill-health or redundancy may make it more difficult to adjust to retirement.

Another Australian-based meta-analysis (a meta-analysis is the examination of data from a number of independent studies of the same subject to determine an overall trend) lists workplace exit conditions in the top five factors predicting life satisfaction at older age. Recognising the impact of work on your health should not be ignored.

4. Don’t assume staying at work as long as possible is right for you

Some insurers report mental health claims outstripping those of other illnesses (including cancer) so carrying on regardless when work is taking a toll might not necessarily be the best option.

Staying on and dying at your desk might not be your only career path. Think about ways to scale back if you need to – move to part-time, start succession planning and consider ways to strategically exit key projects or clients.

It is true that sometimes people get the timing wrong and try to get back to work after running out of money or getting bored, but this might be avoided with: a) a realistic assessment of what works means to you; b) a considered decision about when to leave; c) reflecting on how you will spend your time in retirement; and d) determining if will you have enough money before you leave work.

5. Fear of being bored is probably unfounded

With the abolishment of compulsory retirement age for all but a handful of occupations there is no deadline to leave work.

While it is true that some people find it difficult to adjust to life after work, in the main people adjust well and get happier over time.

Of course, if you are enjoying your work there is no need to retire unless you feel the time is right for you, or you are physically or cognitively compromised. The latter happens far less frequently than you might imagine.

In the main, concerns about being bored in retirement can be avoided and may be unfounded. Years ago I had a theory retirement would be a disaster for people highly invested in their careers. Guess what? I did not find what I was looking for. (That’s not to say it is not true, just that I could not find a relationship.)

What I did find was a lot of busy people transferring that work energy into other activities in retirement. Those who strongly identified with their work were no more or less adjusted to retirement than those who did not enjoy their work.

But it’s worth thinking about how you will spend your time. We estimate you will have 62 hours a week available to you when you retire. Thinking ahead to how you will spend that time can help identify some gaps you may not have considered.

Plan to go to the gym every day? Really? Every day? Maybe try it now – just once. But say you go to the gym 1.5 hours a day for five days a week, that’s 7.5 hours out of the 62 accounted for – only 54.5 hours to go.

Perhaps go for a few sessions before you retire so that you can figure out if it’s for you. You might love it or find that a boot camp, Pilates, walking or pickleball is more your thing.

6. Understand the role of ‘work centrality’

Years later, as I was investigating the careers of doctors, my team did find something interesting. Doctors were delaying retirement because of something known as work centrality (ie, how central work was to their identity).

This idea of dedication to career can start as soon as a person steps into training or their first role. I once worked with a medical student reviewing videos of doctors transitioning into retirement. He confessed he had done very little socially, sporting or extracurricular since he started his medical training.

Would you expect him to pick up the badminton bat or guitar again at 70? When you’ve been the expert in the room for the last 45 years it might be harder than expected to play the role of a newbie.

7. Practise the transition

Our research found only about 21 per cent of people who say they will take up new activities in retirement actually do so.

We also found the Creative Doctors Network, which involved a lot of doctors (some partially retired and others still working) who were doing interesting things – writing, poetry, bagpipe-playing, magic tricks, acting. Some had wound their practices down to part-time. Some had specialised in areas that they enjoyed. Others designed succession plans, so they became mentors.

Sadly, the Creative Doctors Network is no more. But it does illustrate the possibilities of investing in yourself while you are still working to make the transition easier.

The message here is to start easing yourself into networks and activities you plan to enjoy into retirement. Plan to play golf every week? Go four times a year now. Want to change gears and build a niche business? Start networking with your new colleagues and client base. Want to live off-grid in a hut on a hill? Book an Airbnb for a weekend/week/month. You get the idea.

8. It need not be an all-or-nothing affair

Our latest research of a national sample in a randomised control trial intervention is that when you combine career, health and financials you get a better result than just considering financial information alone.

Asking yourself, why do I want to leave? Is it my work I’m leaving? Or the organisation? Or my boss? If it’s the latter two, you might want to explore other options, such as becoming your own boss or finding another organisation better aligned to your values.

You may not need to leave it all behind immediately. Perhaps you could select and continue elements of your work, or work with a smaller group of select clients or projects. Could you specialise in some of the technical aspects of the same role?

Look around to find examples of flexible career paths – the lawyer who manages fewer long-term relationships, the academic who focuses on writing, the CEO who coaches successors.

9. The social stuff is really important

A more recent meta-analysis from the UK suggests that predictors of life satisfaction in older age are more related to physical capability and social support rather than a lack of work-related purpose.

Our own research prioritises wealth, health and social connections as predictors of retirement adjustment. And a meta analysis at the University of Queensland also reinforces social participation and physical health.

So rather than focusing on all those meetings and emails you will be missing, maybe it’s time to get invested in striving for good health and strategies for meeting new people.

Ask yourself, who is your new tribe? Other key questions are, who will you turn to when things get a bit tough, and what’s going to keep your brain active? The answers might be playing bridge, visiting a gallery or learning how to use that fancy camera you bought that’s stuffed in the back of the cupboard.

Start getting into the habit of setting those goals now. Not only will it help you get started, but it will pay dividends in promoting better retirement adjustment when you do retire.

Are you really ready to retire?2024-11-25T11:08:50+11:00

RBA asks treasurer for dividend freeze as its losses soar to $51b

The Reserve Bank of Australia is $20 billion in the red after posting its fourth consecutive yearly loss, and asked Treasurer Jim Chalmers not to pull any money out of the central bank for at least a decade to help repair its tattered balance sheet.

A $4.2-billion shortfall revealed in the RBA’s 2023-24 annual report on Friday takes the central bank’s cumulative losses stemming from extraordinary stimulus measures handed out during the pandemic to $51.2 billion.

“The loss reflects the fact that returns on most of our assets were fixed at the low rates prevailing in 2020 and 2021, but the cost of our liabilities rose with the cash rate target,” governor Michele Bullock said in the report.

It showed Ms Bullock received $1.26 million in remuneration last financial year, which included 2½ months when she was deputy governor to Philip Lowe.

The RBA lent out $188 billion to the banks during the pandemic at rates as low as 0.1 per cent as part of the three-year term funding facility. But the RBA now pays those same commercial banks a much higher floating rate of 4.25 per cent on $232 billion of deposits, meaning the central bank is losing the difference between the lending rate and deposit rate.

RBA asks treasurer for dividend freeze as its losses soar to $51b2024-10-28T16:52:07+11:00

‘Worse before it gets better’: housing targets in doubt

Labor and the Coalition are both on track to miss ambitious targets to address Australia’s housing crisis, as skills shortages and sluggish planning approvals leave would-be home owners stuck renting.

The latest Deloitte Access Economics business outlook report says the Albanese government will probably deliver fewer than a million new homes by 2029 – at least 200,000 below its promised target.

“The housing crisis will get much worse before it gets better,” Deloitte says. “House prices will need to increase before the necessary boost to supply can be delivered profitably.”

Worse still for Labor, new Housing Industry Association research has found the target for 1.2 million new homes within five years would require a 50 per cent increase on current construction levels.

To meet its promise, Labor needs an average of 240,000 new homes need to be built each year. But Australia has only ever come close to that level twice, in 2016 and in 2021. Last year only 173,000 homes were completed.

Housing is set to dominate the federal election campaign, with a growing fight over supply and renters’ rights. Faced with a Greens legislative blockade, Labor agreed with the states to fast-track construction of 1.2 million homes.

But the HIA report says the industry does not have the required workforce capacity to get close, finding about 30 per cent more tradies are needed.

“The housing shortage that is driving up housing costs for Australian households can only be reduced through the efficient delivery of new housing in greater quantities than has been achieved in the past,” it says.

“The workforce of housing industry must grow if this is to occur.”

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton last week pledged expedited construction of 500,000 homes within five years, with a policy to spend $5 billion on water, sewage and other enabling infrastructure to speed up shovel-ready developments.

The Coalition would also block additional changes to the National Construction Code for 10 years, to reduce compliance costs and delays.

Deloitte partner Stephen Smith said the lack of skilled construction workers was a key driver of the housing shortage. BuildSkills Australia, the federal government’s jobs and skills agency, estimates 90,000 workers are required.

“With permanently higher construction costs, the sector will be both unwilling and unable to lift supply unless property prices also lift,” he said. “That is, housing affordability will get worse before it has a hope of getting better.”

Deloitte revised down its forecast of dwelling activity, forecasting fewer than a million new dwellings will be built over the next five years.

HIA senior economist Matt King said the workforce shortages were dogging capital cities and regional areas.

“The new-home building industry is in stiff competition for workers with buoyant non-residential construction activity and a historic Commonwealth government-funded engineering construction project pipeline,” he said.

Mr Dutton said his plan was very realistic and had been designed in consultation with groups including the HIA , the Property Council and Master Builders Association.

“All of them have fully endorsed the policy, and every economist will tell us that we need to get more supply into the housing market, given the demands that are there, given the population growth, and I believe it’s entirely possible,” he told ABC radio.

Housing Minister Clare O’Neil blamed the former Coalition government for the housing crisis.

And Labor’s $32 billion housing policy was being significantly delayed by roadblocks from the Greens and the Coalition in parliament.

Ms O’Neil said more houses were needed in greenfield developments and through increased density in existing areas.

“We need to assist with greenfields development, as our government is doing. We also need state governments to step up a bit on planning reform that will enable us to do infill in existing suburbs,” she said.

‘Worse before it gets better’: housing targets in doubt2024-10-24T16:39:26+11:00

Broke, cold, no capital growth: Tim Gurner’s verdict on Melbourne

Developer Tim Gurner says the Victorian government’s stamp duty cuts are a strong start to get the property market moving again, but warned the effort is doomed to fail unless Melbourne’s reputation as a safe place to invest is restored after years of being pummelled by lockdowns, high taxes and debt.

“The strong consensus in other states is that Victoria is broke, it’s cold, and your property prices don’t go up,” Mr Gurner told The Australian Financial Review.

The long COVID-19 lockdowns under former premier Daniel Andrews had caused “incredible damage … to the brand of Melbourne” and the state government had been in disarray ever since, with a “massive debt problem” that gave property investors no reason for confidence.

“We have some real catching up to do. Melbourne is now the sixth-most-expensive city in the country, which is obviously ridiculous, we should be number two.

“Why would you invest in Melbourne when there’s been next to zero capital growth and the state has a massive debt problem? The stamp duty change is fantastic and at least gives investors a reason to consider the city again.”

Stamp duty relief

Mr Andrews’ successor, Premier Jacinta Allan, this week unveiled 12 months of stamp duty relief for all off-the-plan apartment purchases, including investors and foreign buyers, in a $55 million bid to try to stimulate development of new homes.

Mr Gurner praised the stamp duty changes as the “best decision” the state Labor government had made in years, but said more heavy lifting was needed to address the housing crisis by increasing investment in Victoria, the country’s most heavily taxed state.

Mr Gurner’s eponymous group of companies specialises in luxury apartments and has more than 20 development sites across the country, including in prime locations such as Sydney’s Kent Street overlooking Barangaroo and on Melbourne’s St Kilda Road. He was 154th on this year’s Rich List with a worth of $989 million.

Melbourne house prices have risen by about 10 per cent since 2020, he said, while Perth is up 70 per cent, Adelaide 65 per cent, Brisbane 64 per cent and Sydney by 27 per cent.

Other major developers cautiously welcomed the stamp duty relief. Mirvac chief executive Campbell Hanan said in an ASX release on Tuesday the plan would boost demand in apartment sales, while Salta Properties managing director Sam Tarascio told The Age it would not “stimulate the market to the level required to deliver the stock we need”.

It came amid a rash of Labor announcements on housing, including plans to increase high-rise developments in affluent Melbourne suburbs such as Toorak, Malvern, Armadale and Brighton. On Tuesday, the government announced a new charge on developers to help fund parks, schools and transport near new projects.

The housing announcements in Victoria look set to continue all week. A summary document leaked to Liberal MP James Newbury on Tuesday suggests Ms Allan will launch a plan that will allow owners to build a second dwelling on their block without a permit if certain requirements are met, something Merri-bek City Council in Melbourne’s inner north has already initiated.

Federal, state and local governments across the country are under increasing pressure to get more homes built, to ease prices and cost-of-living pressures such as higher rents and transport costs. Experts warn the joint state and federal government target of 1.2 million new homes by 2029 is in danger of falling far short.

Research by property advisory firm Charter Keck Cramer found that just 2100 new apartments were launched in Victoria in 2023-24, an 80 per cent drop on the 10-year average of 10,200. Mr Gurner said construction costs had risen by 40 per cent since 2020, while revenues are only up by 10 per cent.

“The simple answer to fixing viability is you get brand Melbourne back on the international stage, and you get revenues moving again,” he said.

“We need prices to move, and we need people wanting to live here again. We’ve got great population growth, but our market has been incredibly subdued compared to other states. All you need to do is walk down the streets in Melbourne and people feel flat, whereas in Sydney and Brisbane it’s positive, bustle and upbeat.

“I’m very confident we’re about to have the biggest boom of our lifetime in the next 10 years because we’ve got such an undersupply of housing, but people need confidence that Melbourne is actually a place you want to come to for business or university.”

The pilot infrastructure contribution program announced on Tuesday will be rolled out in January 2027 – after the 2026 state election – and will be limited to the suburbs of Broadmeadows, Camberwell, Chadstone, Epping, Frankston, Moorabbin, Niddrie, North Essendon, Preston and Ringwood.

Mr Gurner said any additional costs to developments would be passed on to consumers.

The keys to fixing the housing crisis in Victoria were fast-tracking development, getting back some of the skilled labour that had been “sucked” into major infrastructure projects such as the $100 billion Suburban Rail Loop, and reforming planning controls, he said.

Broke, cold, no capital growth: Tim Gurner’s verdict on Melbourne2024-10-24T16:36:24+11:00

The value of the housing market hits a record $11 trillion

The total worth of Australia’s housing market surged to a record $11 trillion in September as more homes were built and prices continued to rise despite higher interest rates, data from CoreLogic shows.

Home values increased by 6.7 per cent in the past 12 months, delivering a $900 billion windfall to residential property owners.

Over the year to June, a total of 176,000 new homes were also completed and added to the market, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Kaytlin Ezzy, CoreLogic’s economist, said the total value of the residential sector would continue to rise in the coming years as more homes were built, and dwelling prices lifted further.

“The government hopes to add 1.2 million new homes over the next five years, which would definitely help push the overall value for the Australian residential market higher,” she said.

“We’re also expecting prices to rise over the near to medium term, although the pace of growth would likely ease as we move into spring with more supply coming online.”

Shane Oliver, AMP chief economist said the record high valuation proved the housing market’s resilience and its long-term track record of rising prices.

“This shows that household wealth, which is largely tied to residential real estate, is strong and continuing to rise,” he said.

“Property has come to be relied on as a good way to build wealth, so people still want to get into property, and once there, they do whatever they can to service their mortgages, even if it involves giving up on things for a while.

“But it’s getting harder each year as property prices rise faster than people’s incomes do, which is resulting in greater levels of wealth and intergenerational disparity.”

While price growth is expected to slow in the coming months, the prospect of long-term capital gains would likely entice more property investors, who were already returning in droves, back into the market, Ms Ezzy said.

National home values rose by just 1 per cent in the September quarter, the softest quarterly rise since March 2023.

New listings rose 2.1 per cent over the year to October 6, marking the strongest start to the spring selling season since 2021.

“The surge in new listings have also contributed to the slowdown in value growth as the market absorbs the additional stock,” Ms Ezzy said.

“As we move through spring, we’re likely to see further moderation in value growth as new listings continue to rise, providing some relief for home buyers who have faced intense competition over the past year.

“The increase in available stock is also providing more opportunities for investors to enter the market, which wasn’t the case during last year’s constrained conditions.”

The share of new investor loans surged to 38.6 per cent in August, the highest level since 2017 when the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority further tightened lending rules to investors by limiting the portion of interest rate only loans to 30 per cent of all lending.

“The high investor activity is likely due to the perceived opportunities for capital gains over the long term and tighter rental market conditions driving potential yield growth,” she said.

In the past 10 years, house values climbed by 85.9 per cent nationwide, or the equivalent of $403,349, while units gained 41.2 per cent or $193,706.

Sydney’s house prices climbed by 95.2 per cent to $1.47 million, Brisbane jumped by 97.8 per cent to $973,534, while Melbourne lifted by 70.4 per cent to $925,762.

Adelaide house values rose by 94.9 per cent to $856,856, Hobart was up by 89.6 per cent to $692,504 and Canberra by 77.9 per cent to $966,684.

Despite Perth’s recent strong showing, house prices only increased by 58 per cent in the past 10 years to $830,965.

Sydney’s premium suburbs Bellevue Hill and Dover Heights topped the biggest gainers, with values more than doubling in the past decade. Their house prices increased by $6.8 million or 162.1 per cent to $11 million, and by $3.7 million or 144.6 per cent to $6.23 million respectively.

House prices in cheaper suburbs Leppington and Ruse in the south-west also rose sharply, increasing by 164.7 per cent and 140.5 per cent respectively.

Across Melbourne, suburbs in the Mornington Peninsula such as Somers, Portsea and Sorrento dominated the long-term performers, with their median increasing by more than 140 per cent.

House prices in Brisbane’s D’Aguilar in the city’s north and Robertson in the south racked up the largest gains at 167.7 per cent and 148 per cent respectively.

The value of the housing market hits a record $11 trillion2024-10-11T09:49:15+11:00

America shares Australia’s housing pain

News feature Affordability, supply, interest rates and high immigration create a scenario in the US that is all too familiar, writes Matthew Cranston.

Abla Assikouyo, a nanny who emigrated from Togo, and her husband Komi, who works at an Amazon warehouse, have just experienced one of life’s great challenges: buying their first home in America.

But the couple’s experience was made almost unbearable by pressures all too familiar to millions of Australians: cost-of-living strains, rising home prices, high interest rates, and supply shortages.

‘‘It was very, very difficult,’’ says Abla, 35, who has three children. ‘‘We got a loan approval for $US500,000, but then they reduced it to $400,000 because of our jobs and our expenses like car loans. So, even when we found the right house, it was difficult for us to pay.’’

A months-long search finally yielded a three-bedroom home in the county north of Washington for $US475,000 ($712,000), still well above their loan offer. However, one of America’s largest lenders agreed to cover all but their deposit of just 3 per cent, charging a 6.99 per cent interest rate.

‘‘We were lucky. My [extended] family started looking before us for one year, and they could not get anything. They had a loan, but they couldn’t buy one, so they went back to renting. The competition is very bad,’’ says Abla

As in Australia, America’s first home buyers are struggling to break into the market. Despite high interest rates, which often depress prices, supply constraints and new housing stock shortages are keeping prices relatively high.

The result is that affordability in the US, while not as bad as Australia, has deteriorated. The classic measure of affordability – median home price to median household income – varies widely from one population centre to the next, but the average, of four times, is high by historical standards, according to analysts Demographia.

In Australia, average prices are nine times household income.

Consequently, first home buyers now account for just 30 per cent of purchases in the US, down from 50 per cent 10 years ago.

In Canada, where the federal government has announced billions of dollars in new loans and tax breaks, housing affordability has also worsened, despite a recent jump in new home starts to their highest level in seven months.

In the US and Canada, the housing crisis has been aggravated by a surge in immigration, also a key contributor in Australia. With America’s growing immigration problems, demand is outpacing supply. US residential property prices increased 5 per cent in the past year, despite the 22-year-high interest rates. Rents are also still rising at more than 5 per cent a year.

Supply is lacking. The seasonally adjusted number of new private housing units under construction in the US has fallen for the past five months and is down 4 per cent from this time last year, despite hitting a record 1.7 million last July. Economists expect another low number when the latest figures are released on Thursday (Friday AEST).

President Joe Biden has pledged to tackle the crisis, but experts say his administration is too focused on making it easier to buy homes, rather than increasing the number available.

‘‘Government is very good at adding to demand, but very poor at adding to supply,’’ says Edward Pinto, co-director of the American Enterprise Institute’s Housing Centre.

‘‘When you have a supply shortage, and you increase demand, the inevitable result is that prices go up. And so, rather than making housing more affordable, the government makes it less affordable. That in a nutshell is the problem we face,’’ he tells The Australian Financial Review.

Biden is promising to add 2 million new ‘‘affordable’’ homes to the market if he gets tax credit legislation passed in Congress. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has set a target of 240,000 new homes a year – twice the number currently being built in Australia.

Biden is proposing a $US10,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers and those who sell their starter homes. His administration estimates the credit would reduce the mortgage rate on a median home by more than 1.5 percentage points for two years. More than 3.5 million middle-class families could benefit, it says. Presidential rival Donald Trump has not announced any major policy on lifting affordable supply. But he says one solution is to remove investment property tax credits, something Australia’s Labor Party proposed during the 2019 election.

Pinto agrees abolishing tax deductions for second homes could make a difference to supply. ‘‘If the government stopped subsidising second homes through the interest deduction, those existing homes could convert from second homes to primary residences. It would decrease demand because people wouldn’t be buying as many second homes,’’ he says.

Some 700,000 homes would shift from being second homes to primary residences over 10 years if the idea went ahead, Pinto’s institute has calculated. But Congress is unlikely to agree on the initiative, as many legislators who own second homes would take a hit, he says.

While governments in Australia, the US, Canada and elsewhere are struggling with measures to boost supply, others are tackling the situation by getting out of the way. A surge in illegal immigration has resulted in skyrocketing home prices in California, prompting an exodus of residents to Texas, searching for cheaper houses.

That’s proved an economic boon for Texas, which has a low regulatory environment. Texas built more homes than any other state in the year to July 31, 2023, adding 260,000 – more than twice as many as California, according to the US Census.

Texas home builder Steve Boyd says his higher-end home building business has grown at 10 per cent every year for the last few years. He’s been able to hold his margin despite rising costs.

‘‘The demand has been really good for us,’’ he says. ‘‘But I don’t see how the government can help the supply, though. Maybe removing more regulation.’’AFR

America shares Australia’s housing pain2024-06-26T16:46:39+10:00